THEORETICAL RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS OF ONE LAW FOR ONE SOCIETY AND MULTIPLE LAWS FOR MULTIPLE SOCIETIES
Downloads
Abstract
The Indonesian legal system is a combination of several religious, customary and European legal systems, especially the Dutch as a nation that once colonized Indonesia for 3.5 centuries. So, it is not surprising that their inherited civilization includes the legal system. Living law refers to the laws that are still valid and applied in society, including customary law, religious law, and positive law. This law can coexist with various other laws, such as civil, constitutional and criminal law, which apply according to the context and issues that arise in society. Therefore, it is important to understand and accommodate the various sources of law in a society to achieve justice and order. In the Indonesian context, the applicability of law to the life of society and the state involves various factors, including public awareness, lawmaking, and juridical, sociological and philosophical foundations. Indonesia's legal system is a combination of several legal systems, including religious, customary and state law. This shows the complexity in the application of law in society, which requires a comprehensive understanding and accommodation of various sources of law to achieve legal objectives, such as order, justice and security.
Keywords:
Theoretical Law For One Society Multiple Laws and SocietiesReferences
Sugiharto. (2023, Juni 19). Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (KPKNL Palembang) Retrieved Desember 5, 2023, from https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-palembang/baca-artikel/16210/KEBERLAKUAN-HUKUM-BAGI-KEHIDUPAN-BERMASYARAKAT-DAN-BERNEGARA.html
Tristam Pascal Moeliono, A. A. (2022, Juli 6). Hukum Online. (Hukum Online) Retrieved Desember 5, 2023, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/hukum-yang-hidup-dan-berkembang-dalam-masyarakat-lt62c4fc0925088/
Wignyosubroto, S. (2007). Hukum dan Masyarakat (Perkembangan dalam Masyarakat, sebuah pengantar ke arah kajian sosiologi hukum). Malang: Media Publishing.
Istanto, F. S. (1999). Teknik dan Metode Peneltiian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian UAJY.
Tungadi, T. (2004). Apakah Pentingnya Mempelajari Perbandingan Hukum. Jakarta: Pradya Paramita.
Subekti. (1983). Perbandingan Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Pradya Paramita.
Atmasasmita, R. (1989). Asas-asas Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia.
MD, M. (2011). Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi (Vol. 2). Jakarta, : PT. Raja Grafindo.
Waluyadi. (2001). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif. Jakarta: Djambatan.
(2023, Maret 28). Retrieved Desember 5, 2023, from https://fh.esaunggul.ac.id/faktor-yang-membuat-hukum-disetiap-negara-berbeda/
S, M. (2015). Budaya hukum dalam masyarakat multikultural. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syari, 2(2), 1-34.
Jawardi. (2016). Strategi pengembangan budaya hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 1(16), 77-93.
Susilawati, S. (2008). Kebijakan Implementasi Penyulihan dalam rangka tahun peningkatan budaya hukum nasional. Jakarta: BPHN.
Rahardjo, S. (1996, Agustus 20). Pembangunan Hukum di Indonesia Dalam Konteks Global, Makalah seminar pertemuan Dosen/Peminta Sosiologi Hukum se Jawa Tengah dan DIY Yogyakarta di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Susanto, I. (1999). Kejahatan Korporasi di Indonesia Produk Kebijakan Baru, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Undip. 14.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Evita Vibriana Wulandari, Zainal Arifin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
