IMPACT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF METHODS OF COACHING FOR SUCCESS, PARTICIPATIVE, AFFILIATIVE, VISIONARY AND SITUATIONAL (COPAVISIT) AT OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES IN DIGITAL ERA
Main Article Content
Hendra Jonathan Sibarani
Nidya Banuari
Esther Praja Anggriany Panggabean
The development of the telecommunications industry in Indonesia is determined by the company's ability to manage operational with using methods of coaching for success, participative, affiliative, visionary and situational. The meaning of coaching for success are with treating people as they want to be treated, that is by indirectly giving punishment, participative by taking part in the problems faced by company management, affiliative by maintaining good relationships with employees and company partners, visionary support progress company, situational is done by looking at the condition of the company that is required to be able to implement the marketing industry 4.0. This research method uses a quantitative approach, the type of quantitative descriptive research with the nature of research that is explanatory. The data used are secondary data, namely employees of cellular telecommunication in Area of Regional I of Medan City as many as 800 people. The sampling technique used in this study using the Slovin formula so that the number of samples used in this study was 89 people. Sampling uses a simple random sampling approach. The results obtained in this study are coaching for success methods have a negative and significant influence, participative and affiliative, have a positive and significant influence, while visionary and situational have no influence on the operational management of cellular telecommunications companies in Medan City.
Askew, S., dan E., Carnell. 2011. Transformative coaching: A learning theory for practice. London, England: Institute of Education, University of London.
A. Morissan M. 2014. Metode Penelitian Survei. Cet-2. Jakarta: Kencana
Bresser, F. (2013) Coaching across the globe: Benchmark results of the Bresser Consulting Global Coaching Survey with a supplementary update highlighting the latest coaching developments to 2013. Books on Demand, Norderstedt, Germany
Clutterbuck, D. and Hussein. 2010. Virtual coach, virtual mentor. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing
Freund, R.J., And Wilson, W.J., 2006, Statistical Methods, Elsevier, Florida, 254
Ghozali, Imam, 2013, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS, Universitas Diponegoro
Goleman, Daniel. 2007. Kecerdasan Emosional. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Juhana, Dudung & Reni Ambarsari. 2012. "Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Visioner Dan Pengembangan Karier Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Serta Implikasinya Pada Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Pertambangan Dan Energi Provinsi Jawa Barat”. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship. Vol.6, No.1, April 2012, Hal 15-25
Mosca, J. B., A. Fazzari, dan J. Buzza. 2010. Coaching to win: asystematic approach to achieving productivity through coaching. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 8(5), 115–130.
Sibarani, Hendra Jonathan. 2016. Dampak Penggunaan Coaching Method Dan Supervisi Tenaga Penjualan (Sales Agent) Terhadap Pencapaian Target Volume Penjualan di Call Center Outbound Telkomsel Area Regional I Kota Medan. Jurnal Manajemen Prima. Vol.VI. No. II. Juli 2016
Siregar, Sofyan. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Kencana
Sugiyono, 2011, Metode Penelitian, Kombinasi Mixed Methods, Alfabeta, Bandung
Tamara, Margaretha, 2016. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di Kantor Pusat PDAM Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Agora. Vol. 4. No.1
Verbeke, W., B. Deits, dan E. Verwaal. 2011. Drivers of sales performance: a contemporary meta-analysis. Have salespeople becomeknowledge brokers? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 407–428. Watts, M., dan S. Corrie. 2013. Growing the ‘I’ and the ‘We’ in transformational leadership: The Lead, Learn & Grow Model, The Coaching Psychologist, Vol. 9, No. 2, December.
