THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INTERNAL AUDIT, AND INVESTIGATIVE AUDIT IN ENHANCING PUBLIC SECTOR FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Main Article Content
Nurul Azizah Tamang
Arifuddin
Syarifuddin
Public sector financial management demands transparency and accountability to realize good governance. However, challenges such as limited human resource competence, weak internal control, and fraud risks remain obstacles in the preparation of government financial statements. This study aims to review the role of financial information systems, internal audit, and investigative audit in enhancing public sector financial accountability. The method used is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) by analyzing 20 articles published between 2021–2025, consisting of national and international literature selected through databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, Google Scholar, and Portal Garuda. The results show that financial information systems, particularly the implementation of SAKTI, serve as the technical foundation of transparency, but their effectiveness highly depends on user competence and organizational support. Internal audit, through the role of APIP/BPKP, functions as a preventive control mechanism that requires independence and institutional support. Meanwhile, investigative audit functions as a reactive protection instrument against fraud, in which the competence and experience of forensic auditors are dominant factors. The synthesis of the literature confirms that the synergy of these three aspects strengthens public financial accountability while supporting the implementation of good governance principles in state financial management.
ACFE. (2024). Occupational fraud 2024: Report to the nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
Ageng, D., & Usman, R. (2023). Pengaruh kapabilitas APIP dan maturitas SPIP terhadap kualitas LKPD. Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 11 (2), 233–248.
Alkhalaileh, R., Al Momani, M. A., & Al-Ahmad, A. (2024). Forensic accounting skills and auditor effectiveness: Evidence from the public sector. Heliyon, 10 (3), e23456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e23456
Alqudah, H., Amran, N. A., & Hassan, N. A. H. (2023). Critical factors affecting internal audit effectiveness in the public sector. Heliyon, 9 (6), e16902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16902
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework: Executive summary. COSO.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
Dianto, H. (2023). Peran akuntansi forensik, audit investigatif, professional judgement, dan whistleblowing terhadap pengungkapan fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Audit Nusantara, 4 (1), 25–36.
Dimitropoulos, G. (2025). Forensic accounting and state-organized crime: The role of investigative audits in detecting white-collar crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 32 (1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2024-0056
GAO. (2025). Standards for internal control in the federal government (Green Book). U.S. Government Accountability Office.
Gultom, C. M. J., & Harahap, S. N. (2023). Evaluasi implementasi Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI) dalam penyusunan laporan keuangan pemerintah. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik Indonesia, 5 (2), 101–115.
Gultom, C. M. J., & Harahap, S. N. (2024). Implementasi Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI) pada penyusunan laporan keuangan satuan kerja pemerintah. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 8 (1), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i1.1890
Haldin, E. M., Amiruddin, & Bakri, A. A. (2022). Pengaruh pengalaman auditor investigasi dan kompetensi auditor investigasi terhadap efektivitas prosedur audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Andalas, 11 (2), 211–224.
Hilal, A. (2024). Peran strategis APIP dalam pencegahan dan deteksi korupsi. Jurnal Studi Hukum, 11 (3), 199–210.
Institute of Internal Auditors. (2017). International professional practices framework (IPPF). IIA Research Foundation.
INTOSAI. (2019). INTOSAI-P 20: Principles of transparency and accountability. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions.
INTOSAI. (2024). ISSAI 100 – Fundamental principles of public-sector auditing. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions.
IPSASB. (2023). The conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities. International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board.
Jannah, R. (2023). Analisis modul GLP pada Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI) Kementerian Agama Provinsi Sumatera Selatan [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Sriwijaya]. Repository Universitas Sriwijaya.
Kurniawati, N. (2025). Peran APIP dalam pengawasan aset tetap di Kabupaten Karanganyar. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah Daerah, 5 (2), 56–67.
Lusiana, M. G. (2022). Evaluasi penerapan sistem pengendalian internal pada instansi pemerintah. Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan Publik, 1 (2), 45–57.
Mahmudi. (2021). Akuntansi sektor publik (Edisi Revisi). UII Press.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi sektor publik. Andi.
Meiranto, W., Choiriyah, A., Rahman, A., & Dewi, N. H. U. (2024). Factors influencing behavioral intention to use SAKTI in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 11 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2301123
Mulyadi. (2016). Sistem akuntansi (Edisi 4). Salemba Empat.
Nadirsyah. (2024). The key role of internal audit in public sector governance. Cogent Business & Management, 11 (2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2314567
Ningrum, D. (2024). Pengaruh audit investigatif terhadap pengungkapan fraud. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Akuntansi, 2 (2), 326–338.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah. Sekretariat Negara.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2010 tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan. Sekretariat Negara.
PermenPAN-RB. (2017). Peraturan Menteri PAN-RB Nomor 38 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Kompetensi Jabatan ASN. Kementerian PAN-RB.
Pratiwi, O. P., & Rely, G. (2024). Efektivitas audit investigatif dan penerapan GCG terhadap pencegahan fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan dan Pengendalian, 2 (2), 98–110.
Punarto. (2024). Analisis penerapan Sistem Aplikasi Keuangan Tingkat Instansi (SAKTI). Jurnal Akuntansi, Tata Kelola dan Bisnis, 7 (2), 115–124.
Putri, O. P., & Rely, G. (2024). Efektivitas audit investigatif dan penerapan Good Corporate Governance terhadap pencegahan fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan dan Pengendalian, 2 (2), 98–110.
Qurratu'Aini, S. (2025). Implementasi SAKTI dalam efisiensi anggaran dan pelaporan pemerintah. Jurnal Menulis: Ekonomi dan Akuntansi Publik, 1 (2), 98–110.
Ramadhan, S. A., & Wijaya, H. (2025). Analisis peran APIP terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah se-Indonesia. Liabilitas: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing, 10 (1), 45–60.
Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2018). Accounting information systems (14th ed.). Pearson.
Sapitri, S., & Putri, N. A. (2024). Pengaruh audit investigasi dan independensi terhadap pengungkapan fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Ekonomi dan Akuntansi (JIMEA), 1 (3), 159–164.
Sembiring, J. (2024). Evaluasi peran APIP dalam manajemen risiko keuangan. Jurnal Administrasi dan Tata Kelola, 15 (1), 88–101.
Singleton, T., & Singleton, A. (2010). Fraud auditing and forensic accounting (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. Wiley.
Utomo, D. (2024). Pengaruh SAKTI dan kompetensi SDM terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan pemerintah. Progress: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12 (1), 45–57.
Wijaya, H., Ramadhan, S. A., & Kurniawan, M. (2025). Kapabilitas APIP dan kualitas laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah. Liabilitas: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing, 10 (1), 45–60.
