BREAKING THE CARBON ACCOUNTING LITERACY GAP THROUGH VOCATIONAL TEACHERS AS A SYSTEMIC LEVERAGE POINT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY TRANSITION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61990/ijamesc.v4i3.793Keywords:
Carbon Accounting, Greenwashing, Vocational Education, Sustainability Literacy, Green EconomyAbstract
The global transition toward a green economy fundamentally transformed the landscape of the accounting profession, yet this transformation had not fully reached the vocational education system responsible for producing Indonesia's accounting workforce. This study showed that the carbon accounting literacy gap among vocational accounting teachers was not merely a matter of individual competency, but reflected a systemic failure that created a chain of ignorance from educators to students to the workers entering the labor market. Using a qualitative approach based on participatory observation of a training program involving 50 vocational accounting teachers from the Tangerang Accounting Teacher Association at Universitas Mercu Buana in April 2026, this study found that nearly all participants had never been exposed to carbon accounting concepts or greenwashing identification frameworks in any prior formal professional training. This finding confirmed that the existing gap was systemic rather than individual in nature. This study further showed that vocational teachers represented the most efficient leverage point for breaking this chain of ignorance, as the multiplier effect inherent to the teaching profession allowed a single training intervention to impact thousands of future workers. The implications of these findings pointed to the need for systemic reform in the professional development of vocational accounting teachers as a prerequisite, rather than a consequence, of Indonesia's successful green economy transition.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. 2012. Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review. 105 (2): 564-608.
Ausubel, D. P. 1968. Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Becker, G. S. 1964. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. New York: Columbia University Press.
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. 2015. The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 21 (6): 624-640.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3 (2): 77-101.
Broadwell, M. M. 1969. Teaching for learning. The Gospel Guardian. 20 (41): 1-3.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edition. California: SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. 2017. Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. 2011. The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review. 54 (1): 64-87.
Driastuti, M., Nengzih, N., & Oktris, L. 2024. The impact of ESG disclosure, environmental cost, and corporate reputation on financial performance. Business and Investment Review. 2 (3): 47-56.
Geels, F. W. 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 1 (1): 24-40.
International Accounting Standards Board. 2023. IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. London: IFRS Foundation.
Meadows, D. H. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Nugroho, L., Oktris, L., Apollo, A., Andesto, R., Soeharjoto, S., & Putra, Y. M. 2025. Optimalisasi publikasi guru di era Merdeka Belajar: Kolaborasi MGMP dan perguruan tinggi dalam penguatan kompetensi penulisan ilmiah. Dedikasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. 4 (1): 15-24.
Oktris, L., & Sitardja, M. 2018. The effect of global competitive index on carbon disclosure. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development. 11 (04): 35-44.
Oktris, L., Azzahra, S. F., Nengzih, N., Amalina, N., & Saat, M. M. 2025. Artificial intelligence and sustainability reporting: Performance outcomes in ESG investing. EQUITY: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi. 28 (2): 219-237.
Oktris, L., Fadjarenie, A., & Brian, M. A. 2025. Carbon taxes and disclosure: Drivers of sustainable financial performance in energy firms. KnE Social Sciences. 10 (21).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. 2017. Peraturan OJK Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik. Jakarta: OJK.
Rankin, M., Windsor, C., & Wahyuni, D. 2011. An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 24 (8): 1037-1070.
Revans, R. W. 1982. The Origins and Growth of Action Learning. London: Chartwell-Bratt.
Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. California: SAGE Publications.
TerraChoice Environmental Marketing. 2010. The Seven Sins of Greenwashing. Ottawa: TerraChoice.
World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2004. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Washington DC: WRI.
Yuliyanto, & Oktris, L. 2022. The effect of sustainability report, profitability on company value with intellectual capital as a moderation variable. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. 7 (8).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lin Oktris, Afzal Izzaz Zahari, Suharmadi, Hirdinis M., Rafli Adhira Saputra, Metta Ciptaningtyas, Widya Simamora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





































